Pronouns, political correctness and manufacturing controversy

After the release of inaccurate articles such as this one by The Independent, Oxford University Students' Union has issued a statement refuting the notion that it had mandated referring to other students by the gender-neutral pronoun "ze." To be clear, they say:

We have not produced a leaflet implying that all students must use ‘ze’ pronouns to refer to others, or indeed to themselves.

 They add:

We would also like to clearly state that we would never tell anyone to use ‘ze’ pronouns instead of ‘he’ or ‘she’ if ‘he’ or ‘she’ is the pronoun someone wishes to use.

But they also point out:

We do however suggest the use of genderless pronouns like singular ‘they’ to refer to individuals whose pronouns haven’t been confirmed. This avoids assuming what pronouns a person uses based solely on how they present themselves.

Not really that controversial, is it - or so you would think.

Yet a quick scan of comments under the The Independent article shows their clickbaity insistence that "Oxford University students must refer to each other using gender neutral pronouns such as “ze” instead of “he” or “she”" has clearly had its desired shit-stirring effect. Every single bingo square in the awful game of "hateful, moronic shit that inevitably gets said in any debate about trans rights" is ticked. The "why can't I just call them 'it'?" square. The "urgh, Generation Snowflake needs to get over itself," square. The "there are two genders and that's it, you just don't understand biology!" square. The "you can't use 'they' in a singular sense" square. And on and on and on, although I'm pleased to note there are also quite a few voices of reason challenging the uninformed and bigoted. I myself pointed out that The Indy is spreading a falsehood, but still got replies insisting that "ze" was now being taught in schools (I usually hate it when people respond like this online, but in this case I really could only think, "um, SOURCE?!"), that this is just the thin end of the wedge before more ker-razy made-up words get foisted upon us, that the people who have fought not to be labelled are now demanding just that and how silly and illogical they must therefore be.

Thankfully, there are people out there who can see what's really going on, and in a Facebook statement, OUSU's deputy women's officer Orla White pre-empts pretty much every one of these comments by identifying exactly why the media loves to start arguments over phantoms in this manner. They write:

The most important thing. . . is not the misinformation that's being spread: it's why. 

The reason that misinformed news about trans students can go viral is because of a general lack of understanding, empathy or respect for trans people in general.

It's because ze pronouns, other neopronouns, singular 'they' pronouns and even 'she' or 'he' pronouns are considered 'funny/weird/silly' when trans people use them. 

It's because any action to make spaces more inclusive for trans people is seen as extreme, absurd and an indicator of being a 'special snowflake' with all the fun add-ons that brings. 

It's because trans people are seen as being pretenders or fakes. 

It's because trans people are seen to be 'overly demanding' when asking for the most basic level of respect. 

It's because of transphobia, basically.

Couldn't have said it better myself. 

By publishing such a poorly researched article, The Independent and other media outlets who reported on what is effectively a non-story knew exactly what they were doing. They were portraying trans people as unreasonable, demanding and wanting special treatment (pretty much the same accusation levelled at gay people a couple of decades previously when LGB folks dared to suggest that they didn't just want a life free of discrimination and violence, but would actually like to enjoy equal rights on matters such as the age of consent, adoption and marriage rights). They were pandering to an audience who thinks exactly that about trans people - that at best they are to be pitied and endured, at worst shoved back in the box they came out of - and pitting them against readers who actually have a modicum of empathy with or knowledge about what it means to be gender non-conforming. They were stirring up at internet flame war (yes, I know that term sounds so 1997, but let's face it, the concept has never died, only multiplied, since social media came along) at the expense of any nuanced or sensible discussion about how, if you're not sure what pronoun someone likes to use, it makes sense to refer to them as "they" until you do know, and when you get an opportunity, just ask that person how they'd like to be referred to.

Even if neopronouns like ze, hir and so on (which by the way, have been around for decades--it just took the culture of clickbait to bring the concept to the mainstream) weren't at issue here, something else would be - because transphobia demands it. You only need to listen to the voices of trans people to ascertain that. It's not like prior to this issue, we existed in a world where binary-conforming trans people were never misgendered, is it? Deliberately calling trans women "he" has been a favourite pastime of the cis population for decades, as were comedy sketches emphasising the failure of trans women to "pass" - think Little Britain and The League of Gentleman, where an overly masculine trans woman character was repeatedly mocked for her inability to present as truly feminine. I read on Twitter only yesterday the story of a non-binary individual who had a job interview on Skype, and heard her interviewers saying - thinking the call had ended - "MTF or FTM? I can't tell!" and laughing. And it was truly upsetting to read in the wake of the Oakland warehouse fire that people who perished in the fire were still being misgendered in reports about their deaths. Basically, there always has been a vocal pocket of cis individuals who think that being asked to refer to someone who used to identify as "he" as a "she" (or vice versa) is just soooo damn unreasonable. I would put money on these individuals not having any problem with referring to a married woman by her new surname, or by Mrs instead of Miss (assuming she chooses to make these changes, and don't get me started on the toxicity of assumptions surrounding that), yet remembering a difference of one damn letter is apparently just too much of an audacious demand to make of them.

Julia Serano has written extensively and eloquently on how trans identities are repeatedly seen as less real, less legitimate, more artificial and therefore duplicitious, in opposition to cis identities. A cis woman who wears make-up is just celebrating her femininity; a trans woman who does the same must be trying to "pass." A cis man who buffs up at the gym is just making sure his body looks the best it can; a trans man who does the same must be desperately overcompensating for his birth chromosomes. Indeed, I very recently heard a depressing tale of some acquaintances who really should know better laughing about a transmasculine's person appearance and demeanour, as if the attempts of someone born female to present masculine were both pathetic and comedic, People who believe in these overly simplistic and divisive narratives of gender are basically looking for any opportunity they can find to discredit trans people, to not have to "give in" and address as female a person they cannot bring themselves to believe is a woman, or address a trans man as male; add the idea of non-binary genders into the mix and they inevitably melt down in an implosion of "WAAAARGHH SPECIAL SNOWFLAKES PC GONE MAD WHY CAN'T I JUST CALL THEM IT WHAT ABOUT THE DAYS WHEN MEN WERE MEN AND WOMEN WERE OBJECTIFIED AND WE WERE ALL GLAD OF IT?!" The point is, the problem has never been with the pronouns. Bigots objected when we were mostly just dealing with "he" and "she" - of course they're going to go apeshit when asked to consider "they/ze/hir".There are still those who want to know why they can't still talk about "coloureds" "poofs" and "trannies," FFS, and will cry oppression from PC culture when challenged. That's not a reason for us to cede any ground to such people.

I'll leave the last words to Orla White:

So, no, we didn't publish a leaflet banning gendered pronouns. But we do stand against transphobia. The factual incorrectness of these articles is one thing; the way that it's used to make basic human decency towards trans people seem laughable is quite another.

Gender and roller derby - are we as progressive as we think we are?

There's been a lot of conversation in the roller derby community about transgender skaters this week, some of it extremely sombre in light of the suicide of a trans junior skater, Sam Taub, in the States. There has been other, more positive news regarding the acceptance and accommodation of non-gender-conforming skaters, and following the awful, needless death of Sam/Casper #57 (believed to be as a result of transphobic bullying) a lot of people vowing to create a roller derby community that is free of bullying and supportive of trans skaters.

I think this is absolutely a vow that everyone in the community needs to take - not to mention anyone in any community - but I think people need to go further than just making pledges. It's important that we really think about how assumptions about gender, and accompanying, often hidden sexism, underpin so much casual talk and thoughtless humour that take place in our sporting scene. Even in roller derby, a community that is considered more progressive than most when it comes to gender, sexuality and self-expression, I've witnessed or heard about the following:

- femaleness being used as in insult - "I'm going to treat you like a girl." "You're just a woman with a beard"

- women being criticised/mocked by other women for having body hair

- women's sexual behaviour being judged by other women

- sex between men joked about, with the implication that it's degrading (especially for the receptive partner)

- trans skaters being told they could do with some 'tips' on 'how to pass'

- a woman joking that she was going to check another skater's genitalia to make sure she was female

It can be hard to draw a line between what's an acceptable amount of twatting about in a sport that by its very nature requires a developed sense of humour and an ability to brush off insults - this is, after all, a game in which you will spend much of your time falling over, being hit and having to laugh about it. You will encounter trash talk from other teams. You will hear off-colour jokes. You'll hear a lot of smut talked, and you'll accidentally touch more bums, boobs and crotches than even an overworked healthcare professional. I can't claim that every joke, comment or action I've ever made while participating in this sport will have been devoid of the potential to offend someone. But thinking about how to create a community that makes people feel able to express their gender identity without being harassed about it, the thought occurs that maybe we all need to be pulled up sharp.

Because it's not just about outright bullying, although obviously that needs to be stamped on. But it's easy to pride ourselves on not being part of the problem if we only target the blatant types of harassment. It's too easy to pat yourself on the back and say "Well, I never call anyone 'fag', 'bulldyke' or 'tranny,' so I'm cool," or "Well I use X's correct pronouns, so I'm obviously not transphobic," but I think what really needs to happen is a deep - and potentially uncomfortable - examination of our underlying prejudices. And it's not easy. For example, several of my teen years were spent laughing at The League of Gentleman, a deeply dark UK comedy from the late 90s/early 2000s in which most of the women characters were played by men in drag. The comedy wasn't derived from this fact as such, but there was one transgender character 'Barbara the taxi driver', and pretty much all the laughs at her scenes were based around her deep voice, her chest hair and total failure to 'pass' as a woman. You never saw Barbara's face and never found out anything about her other than the fact she was trans. Some of the laughs were more directed at her passengers' obvious discomfort as Babs described the details of her transition in colourful language - "Me nipples are like bullets" - but looking back on it, it's hard to really defend the show as it was pretty much ticking every "Let's laugh at the man in a dress," box imaginable. Babs was a caricature, not a person. So, you might say, were most other characters on TLOG - a paedophile school teacher, a cursed vet, a vile Job Centre Officer, a corrupt butcher, the inbred owners of the Local Shop - but it's disingenuous to deny that the portrayal of trans people in popular culture is something of a mirror to how we view them in real life. Not long ago it was OK to make the brown-skinned person the butt of the joke in UK comedy, or the gay person. Ceasing to take the piss out of trans people has been a bit of an afterthought, and a stage we're still in the process of reaching.

I love the fact that in roller derby there are people willing to challenge the idea that a man wearing brightly coloured leggings is degrading. I like the fact that enough guys do things like this that it no longer becomes about "He might be gay" "He might be a cross dresser," or "That makes him feminine," and it just simply becomes a fact of "He has chosen to wear those leggings, and that is all that matters." (Obviously, if any of the other three statements are true, that also shouldn't be an issue - but my point is that we need to start uncoupling styles of dress from assumptions about gender or sexuality) However, there still remains, to an extent, the idea that to make a man dress like a woman is degrading. At one recent game there was a bout where, to raise money for charity, you could pay for 'extras' such as silly rule additions to the game, or forfeits for skaters. At one point, a group paid for a male skater to wear a tutu for several jams. Now, you could say that this was more about fun and fancy dress - if you're trying to look dead serious in no-nonsense black, a bright red tutu is going to shit up your game look whether you're male or female. And also, unless you are a ballet dancer or one of those women who wears fantastic 50s frocks with layers of netting underneath, you're probably going to be pretty uncomfortable wearing a tutu, whoever you are. But I would also say that it's being deliberately obtuse to say there's absolutely no connection to gender whatsoever. Roller derby started out all-female. It also, in its current incarnation (2006 or so onwards) did start with a lot of girls wearing tutus as part of the brightly coloured, fun, fishnets-n-hotpants aesthetic that the sport still retains to some extent. For a guy to don that clothing is certainly to flip the script, but what's actually meant to be funny about it? Why's it something people pay money to see? I can only think that it's because a guy having to dress as a woman is seen as degrading. And why do we think that, unless we think that being a woman is degrading? Sexism and transphobia, they're more closely linked than you might think.

My team trains co-ed and I generally really like that fact, as I think it does encourage us to see each other simply as 'skaters' rather than 'guys' and 'gals', it allows everyone to challenge themselves in different ways, and it puts paid to blanket assumptions about one gender being 'better' at any particular skill than the other. I love the fact that our skaters look and dress however they're most comfortable both at training and on bout day, that I feel comfortable say, wearing no bra on a hot training day, or changing shorts in front of a room full of people, knowing that no one is going to comment or lech or stare in a way that sadly, as a woman, you come to expect in the outside world. But sexism can appear in more subtle ways. If you believe - and I kind of do - that homophobia is the fear that men will treat you the way you treat women, then you realise that every act of anti-gay aggression isn't just about guys, it's about women too. It's about straight men saying to gay men "You act like a woman, and that is shameful." 

Put a group of guys together and you will inevitably encounter jokes about each others' sexuality. Add some close physical contact - which is unavoidable in roller derby - and it's only a matter of time before the gay jokes start. Some men, mindful of the notion that only a man truly comfortable with his heterosexuality won't mind being called gay, like to defuse this by playing 'gay chicken', a bit like the scene in Philadelphia when Denzel Washington's lawyer character, asked if the fact he's defending a gay man means he's now getting "light in the loafers" himself, responds "Yeah. I'm changing. I'm on the prowl for a man, a man like you," to the dismay of his terrified, homophobic questioner. And I've seen this employed by male skaters, and I think it's both a brave and funny way to deal with homophobes (see also "What are you, gay or something?" "Give us a kiss and I'll tell you.") And not all gay-related humour in the roller derby community that I've seen is about demeaning homosexuality, but rather challenging the discomfort of the homophobic heterosexual - such as the guy I saw caressing his own nipples in order to psyche out another male player. But I've also seen the standard gay-is-degrading, a-man-who-lets-another-man-penetrate-him-is-a-figure-of-fun jokes, and that disappoints me. And if I were a gay or trans player, it'd make me think twice about being out amongst such people. 

I think the roller derby community is still light years ahead of mainstream culture in many ways. It will never be perfect, because you can't achieve a perfect microcosm that's removed from the real world - it's just not possible. Most people seem to accept, or don't know or don't care that I'm polyamorous, kinky and highly sexed, but there'll always be the odd sniffy comment, cos that's people and that's life. Fortunately, most of it is sufficiently removed from me that I feel able to carry on being my sweet self. I'd like to think that other people whose modus operandi differs from what's demanded of them by narrow cultural expectations - be that being female and having hairy pits, or being male and enjoying wearing skirts, or being fat, or extremely skinny, or being a butch woman, a femme guy, an androgynous, gender fluid individual, wearing no make-up, wearing loads of make-up, having tattoos, piercings and crazy coloured hair - feel similarly free and safe to be themselves in the derby community in a way that they might not elsewhere in society. I just think that there's always more to do, always aspects of our beliefs, prejudices and narratives that we can be examining. Because culture never stops evolving, and the fact that the comedy I enjoyed as a teen would now be viewed as transphobic is not a sign of 'political correctness gone mad', it's a sign that people are learning to be less awful. We are pretty damn good at this in the roller derby community, but we must never stop trying to be better.

Gender policing and roller derby

"The bar was regularly raided by the police, and female patrons would be arrested for not wearing at least three items of "feminine clothing" and males for dressing in drag."

Tui Gordon, writing in Revolutionary Women about the Stonewall Inn, a popular 60s hangout for gay and trans people.

I've been reading Emma Donoghue's latest novel Frog Music, set in San Francisco's great heatwave of 1876. Far from being the capital of liberal sexual attitudes that SF is considered today, the city is a nightmare of racism and sexism, and also - as cross-dresser Jenny Bonnet finds out - a place where gender policing is rigidly exercised. Jenny spends most of her life on the run from the police for the crime of wearing "male attire". We can congratulate ourselves that, in Western society at least, progress in this area has been considerable. Although it's telling that cross-dressers and gender-nonconforming individuals were still being arrested nearly 100 years after the era in which Frog Music is set, we like to think that in the open-minded 21st century, we have put all that unpleasantness behind us, that unpleasantness being a world where gender presentation was so oppressively policed.

Unfortunately, I think that's a fiction, and this article reminded me why. I was really disappointed to read that the Women's Flat Track Derby Association, considered the representative governing body for the majority of women's roller derby teams, has a gender policy which places the onus on transgender or intersex individuals to prove they are 'sufficiently female'.

I play roller derby. I love it. And I understand why there are heated discussions about gender in this sport, because in its present life cycle (2000s onwards), derby started as a female-only sport. The appearance and growth of 'merby' has been controversial for those who loved the fact that women finally had a sport to themselves, one that they founded, ran and which was not just considered an adjunct to a male version of that sport. That's a debate for another day, but I'll say now that I don't believe that shitting on men ever elevates women. Asking that men respect and behave appropriately in what some clearly felt was a sacred space for women is one thing - trying to oust them with the same tactics used on, say, women in all-male golf clubhouses, is nothing short of hypocritical.

But anyway. What I and many others love about derby is its diversity. A place where people of all ages, races, body shapes, athletic ability, sexual orientation and gender presentation come together, put on some skates and knock the bejesus out of each other. A place where you're as likely to see a man in tiny spandex shorts or garish knee socks as you are a woman, where you can dress up in glitter and fishnets if you like, or keep it purely athletic in compression tights, or rock baggy basketball shorts, a skort, a kilt, skate shorts... no one bats an eyelid. Derby is a community in which nobody polices anyone's appearance (beyond, say, the rules that say you can't wear safety pins on track...which I think we can all live with) and that's why so many of us who find mainstream society hostile to our personal style or gender presentation consider it a safe haven.

Now, I know style of dress and biological sex aren't the same thing. However, where I think the parallels hold up, is in WFTDA's demand that transgender or intersex women who wish to play women's derby provide evidence from a healthcare provider "that the athlete’s sex hormones are within the medically acceptable range for a female". I don't even know where to start with that sentence. For one, I'd love to know who gets to dictate what the "medically acceptable range for a female" is, and on what basis? Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) have a higher level of testosterone than women who don't, so by this logic are they to be considered, say, 10% 'less female' than the rest of us? Am I more of a woman than my female friends whose body hair is thicker than mine, and less of a female because my voice is deeper than theirs? Are my male friends who have man boobs less masculine than their smooth-pectoralled counterparts, and are the bald guys I know more 'medically male' than guys with full heads of hair, because apparently higher testosterone levels are more likely to result in male pattern baldness?

To make these distinctions would not only be hateful, but it would also be pointless. And it would be especially pointless in roller derby, a sport where I regularly marvel at the varieties of way in which people demonstrate that it is possible to present as male, or female, or neither, or both. Few of us would make the cut for adhering to 'expected' standards of masculinity and femininity - the tall, solid Amazonians and muscular, athletic women would be rejected immediately, as would the extremely slim, sometimes bony, boyish-figured women who often make excellent jammers. Those of us who prefer short hair, or eschew make-up, or who are tattooed and pierced from head to foot would be immediately under suspicion. And then we'd have to turn round to the merby players and start weeding out those with long hair, soft skin, higher voices, less body hair, lack of muscle, plump pectorals etc etc. Those, of course, are just physical manifestations of sex and gender - don't even get me started on the bajillion different aspects of personality which are woven into each individual in a unique way, and yet which are still, often frustratingly, considered 'typically male' or 'typically female'. Even I, with my long hair, cisgender body and love of make-up would still probably miss the "sufficiently female" mark due to my high sex drive, assertive personality and failure to get excited about trips to Ikea.

The powers that be would say we have to draw a line somewhere, and that if the line is drawn 'medically', that somehow makes it OK. But take a squiz at these statistics and tell me if you'd know where to draw the line. 1 in every 1666 births results in a human being whose chromosomes are neither XX or XY. That's (roughly) 63,000 people in the UK who do not fit the 'medical definition' of maleness of femaleness. That's a fuck of a lot of people. And that's just one way of presenting with ambiguous biological sex. If we factor in all the other known intersex conditions - Androgen Insensitivity, Klinefelter's Syndrome, hypospadias etc - as well as people who present as intersex without known cause, we're looking at more like 1% of the population not fitting into exact categories of male and female. In the UK alone that's over half a million people. Hardly a 'niche' group, is it?

This is obviously not to account for those who are not intersex, but are assigned a gender at birth and wish to transition to the other gender, or who feel that the gender binary offers far too limiting and simplistic roles and would rather live on a fluid spectrum, and who consider themselves transgender, genderqueer/genderfluid or a-gender. But they also make up a significant part of our population, and one which is already subject to enough hatred, violence and policing to put our supposedly civilised society to shame.

So why, in the face of so much evidence to the contrary, would WFTDA perpetuate the myth that fitting neatly into category 'male' or 'female' is "just that simple" and then add insult to injury by putting the onus to prove maleness or femaleness entirely on an individual who will already have been given enough shit about their gender identity to last 100 lifetimes? Why must the spotlight be on them, when none of the rest of us cisgender folk probably 'pass'? Why does the transgender or intersex person have to undergo unnecessary and invasive tests and then submit private medical information to their league, when none of the rest of us are obliged to? How on earth does that create "a level playing field. . .free of discrimination", which WFTDA claims to provide?

Either we're all subject to this gender policing or none of us are. Don't give me false scare stories about men trying to infiltrate women's sport and then skewing the limits of competition by being 'too fast' or 'too strong'. Does anyone really believe someone would go to the trouble of falsely presenting as transgender, with all the vile abuse, threats, violence, legal discrimination and increased risk of your death by suicide and murder which that entails, just to beat other women in the 100 metre sprint? Come the fuck on. It doesn't work like that. People present as the gender they feel themselves to be, it's pretty simple. (Also, apparently higher testosterone alone doesn't necessarily guarantee better athletic performance and again, as this article points out, 'normal' levels are incredibly difficult to define). Anyway in the world of roller derby, which is DIY, run nearly entirely on volunteer power and is probably the least lucrative sport to get involved in unless you're a tiddlywinks fan, no one stands to make any money by secretly fielding a man in disguise to play in a woman's game, so I'm not really sure what WFTDA's logic is. Quite apart from anything, my team already plays co-ed, and plenty of the female players (probably not this unsteady rookie, but our big-hitting, experienced A team women) can hold their own against male players, so 'male' strength/speed isn't necessarily the 'advantage' that it's automatically considered to be.

So I say it again. Unless we're all willing to be subject to invasive questions about what's in our pants, and get needles stuck in our arms to prove we're 'medically acceptable', I don't see how WFTDA can claim that its policy promotes a roller derby world "free of discrimination". They may believe they're trying to protect safe spaces for women, but to me the need to police gender comes precisely from sexism. It comes from a belief that to be female or feminine is degrading, that men who want to present as such are sick, weak or deviant, and that women who want to deviate from presenting as such must be firmly slapped down, lest they get ideas above their station and want to behave 'like men'. It comes from a harmful binary that demands we split ourselves with an arbitrary line then fling mud from either side of it, and spit poison at anyone who dares try to cross that line.

And therefore, it's not something I want any part of.

**Update: WFTDA released a statement on November 10, 2015, announcing that it had done away with the reference to hormone levels, that it considers a person's gender a private and confidential matter, and that anyone who wants to play women's roller derby - be they trans, intersex or gender non-conforming - is welcome to do so. Progress!**

Reflections on LGBT youth in Britain - for Amplify's LGBT Blogathon

On the one hand, Britain can seem like a really progressive place for LGBT youth. There are visible gay teen characters on television in programmes like Skins and Shameless, and these are portrayed realistically and with sensitivity - not as caricatures. All the main British soap operas have had gay and lesbian characters in them. It is no longer illegal for teachers to talk about homosexuality in a positive light since the homophobic piece of legislation Section 28 - introduced by the Conservative government in 1988 - was repealed in 2003. In big cities with thriving gay scenes such as London, Manchester and Brighton, there is a high tolerance for all sexual orientations, and a wealth of support groups and resources for LGBT people.

However, there is still a culture of homophobia in Britain. The beer-swilling, football-watching macho culture that pervades the UK means that you still wouldn't want to be a gay person walking down certain streets, entering certain pubs or clubs, or seated in the middle of a football stadium. 'Queer' 'Faggot' 'Batty boy' and other homophobic insults are still terms of abuse among men, and lesbianism is little better understood, although there is a particularly distasteful double standard whereby men who condemn male homosexuality claim lesbianism is fine because they find it erotic - what they're really referring to is the faux lesbianism of models on the cover of 'lads' mags'. Real gay women still receive abuse, especially from heterosexual men who take their sexuality as a personal insult/rejection, or see these women as trangressing gender boundaries and encroaching upon male culture (I know a gay woman who has been abused and even punched by straight men in public spaces). When Steven K Amos, a British-Caribbean comedian, interviewed groups of black teens about their attitudes to homosexuality, he uncovered deeply homophobic attitudes amongst his community.

Politically, the UK has improved a great deal for LGBT people and hopefully by the time LGBT youth are adults, it will have improved even more. Although homosexuality was legalized in 1967, it took til 2000 for the gay age of consent to be lowered to 16, in line with the heterosexual equivalent. Civil partnerships for gay couples were legalised in 2005, but do not have the same status as civil marriages which are still reserved solely for heterosexual couples.

In comparison with other countries, the UK is doing reasonably well by its gay youths. The Conservative government has realised it has to evolve or dissolve when it comes to gay rights, and there is no way Section 28 would ever get past British lawmakers today - social evolution since the anti-gay Thatcher government reigned in 1988 has been massive. That said, I still recognise that as a heterosexual woman, I've had it easier than my gay counterparts. The girls I know from school who now identify as gay - and there are more than I ever realised when I was at school with them - wouldn't have dared come out at school for risk of bullying and ostracisation. Accusing a peer of being gay is still one of the favoured methods of abuse amongst teen boys, and there is great pressure to be constantly reaffirming one's heterosexuality at every turn - pressure heaped on by our (heterosexual) sex-obsessed tabloid media and worship of footballers and celebrities. Just like you don't find polar bears in the jungle, you'd be very hard pressed to find a gay footballer in the UK. Or at least, an out one.

British attitudes towards trans people, especially young trans people, are lagging behind when it comes to society's evolution. As with the homophobic abuse directed at gay men, there seems to be particular hostility from heterosexual men who feel deeply uncomfortable with a man who dresses as a woman, or feels that his true gender is female. Jokes about 'trannys' and 'chicks with dicks' aren't uncommon, and Female-To-Male (FTM) transgender folk are largely absent from conversations about trans people. However, visibility and positive attitudes increased greatly with the 2011 showing of My Transsexual Summer on one of the UK's main TV channels - this was a sensitive, funny and informative documentary following 7 transgender people with their transitions. The deluge of supportive tweets which followed each episode was heartening to see.

I hope the evolution of British society's attitudes towards LGBT people continues to be positive. I'd say it's definitely getting easier to be a LGBT teen here - but that doesn't mean it's easy yet.

Written as part of the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia Blogathon, in celebration of International Day Against Homophobia (May 17th).